User talk:Poliocretes

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Poliocretes!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BAF F-16 Waddington 020711 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and perspective איכות טובה --Someone35 17:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Misidentification

Hi Tieum512, the aircraft on the right is not an Apache, it's an AH-1W Super Cobra. You might want to change the image name, description and categories. Poliocretes (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the check, i will ask for a rename. i changed the category. Tieum512 (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

As you requested

User:Matanya/log-IDF :) matanya • talk 21:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

And Updated again. (please ignore the red ones, too much effort to clean them out). matanya • talk 06:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shefa-Amr St Peter and St Paul 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Poliocretes, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Leonidas at Thermopylae 070911 02.jpg

File:Leonidas at Thermopylae 070911 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veggies (talk) 12:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Leonidas at Thermopylae 070911 01.jpg

File:Leonidas at Thermopylae 070911 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veggies (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Goring Ram A-4 Hatzerim 201206.jpg

File:Goring Ram A-4 Hatzerim 201206.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 02:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VC-25A TLV 220313 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful --Moroder 18:21, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Nice photo, but quality image? Unless I'm missing something, it's a little dark and has a wicked yellow cast, especially when compared to other photos. I realize the standards for "quality images" on Commons isn't very high, but why would it be nominated (let alone pass) in this this condition? – JBarta (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Question about placement of F-4E(S)photos.

Would F-4E(S) be considered modified RF-4Es. If so would it be better to put the F-4E(S)photos in the RF-4E (Israeli Air Force) in a sub-category rather then under F-4E category?

Articseahorse (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Oh no, the F-4E(S) were most definitely modified F-4Es. There were only 3 ever made, and those from aircraft that had already served the IAF as F-4Es and then shipped back to the US for conversion. Poliocretes (talk) 12:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Poliocretes⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Poliocretes,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Sunset and Sunrise in Tiberias

Hello Poliocretes,

In Tiberias the sun rises from the east (=Sea of Galilee) and the sunset is from teh west (the mountains). It is different from Tel Aviv when the sunset is in the Mediterranean sea I think sunset and sunrise have to include the sun. the other cases are just evening or morning.Geagea (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't think the sun has to be included, otherwise we would have categories like "morning/night at Tiberias". The category can also reflect the time of day. Anyway, the aforementioned photo is most definitely of a sunset, not a sunrise. You can see the western slopes of the Golan bathed in light, while the western shore of the Kinneret (from which the photo was taken) lies in the shadow of the Galilean mountains to its immediate west. The sun is clearly setting in the west, on the photographer's back. If it were sunrise, we'd see the western slopes of the Golan shaded (by the Golan itself), while the western shore of the Kinneret would be lit by the rising sun. Poliocretes (talk) 18:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I added new categorys of evning and morning. Whem I am transalatig to Hebrew Sunrise and Sunset it look like it have to include the sun. But matbe it is different in English. Anyway thanks for helping Israel related categorys. Geagea (talk) 09:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Blue Flag 2015. October 26, 2015

Hello Poliocretes,

Can you help with categorize of the plains in the above category. Thanks in advance. -- Geagea (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Of course, my pleasure. My favourite type of photos :-) Poliocretes (talk) 07:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Geagea (talk) 10:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

And more Category:Dan Shapiro in a «virtual landing» F-35 simulator flies high in Israel, April 2015 ... -- Geagea (talk) 09:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Leonidas at Thermopylae 070911 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Leonidas at Thermopylae 070911 02.jpg

Yours sincerely Geraki ^T_L^G 07:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Savoia Marchetti S.M.79 della Lebanese Air Force.jpg

Il tag corretto è

This work was first published in Lebanon and is now in the public domain because its copyright protection has expired by virtue of the Law No. 75 of 1999 on the Protection of Literary and Artistic Property (details). However attribution of the author is still required. The work meets one of the following criteria: It is an anonymous work or pseudonymous work and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication (or creation, whatever date is the latest) It is a collective or audiovisual work and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication (or creation, whatever date is the latest) It is another kind of work, and 50 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author) It is one of "laws, legislative decrees, decrees and decisions issued by all public authorities and official translations thereof" You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that this work might not be in the public domain in countries that do not apply the rule of the shorter term and have copyright terms longer than life of the author plus 50 years. In particular, Mexico is 100 years, Jamaica is 95 years, Colombia is 80 years, Guatemala and Samoa are 75 years, Switzerland and the United States are 70 years, and Venezuela is 60 years.

, scusa e grazie.--OppidumNissenae (talk) 10:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan 040416 Himeji Castle 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 27 Brigade Memorial 071215 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 20:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Safari 210616 Elephant 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Ambassador Nikki Haley visit June 2017 Ambassador Nikki Haley visit June 2017 (34334854474).jpg

עברית: היי Poliocretes,

האם תוכל לעזור בקטלוג. וגם זה. ‏ -- Geagea (talk) 13:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

מגניבה הראשונה, צריך למצוא לה שימוש Poliocretes (talk) 13:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Helmet_of_Miltiades_050911.jpg

Is the third character on the helmet an L or a Lambda? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naraht (talk • contribs) 15:45, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Not too strong in Greek alphabets, sorry. Poliocretes (talk) 06:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

נא לא להסיר את הקטגוריה של בית שערים

הקטגוריה נדרשת לתחרות. אני מבקשת שתשחזר את ההסרה. תודה Hanay (talk) 13:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

File:AMSTRDM 230217 Moco Banksy 01.jpg

File:AMSTRDM 230217 Moco Banksy 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: work of the living artist Banksy, no FOP Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Alinea (talk) 13:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Clarion Alley 170415 02.jpg

File:Clarion Alley 170415 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Samuel Wiki (talk) 02:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 270416 F-16 Netz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Evenly lit and sufficiently sharp. --Bobulous 18:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240615 Texan II 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 16:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240613 Aerobatic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small, but too small and quality is good --Michielverbeek 07:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240615 Texan II 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 16:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 27 Brigade Memorial 071215 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 07:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:28, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240613 F-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 280616 Texan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 280616 Stearman 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:02, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240615 M-346 Lavi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240615 Yasur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240615 Samson 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avdat 260914 Roman camp 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 280616 Karnaf Reem 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 240615 F-15I Raam 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Clarion Alley 170415 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Clarion Alley 170415 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chinatown Mural 210415.jpg

Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 (talk) 06:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hatzerim 270613 Harvard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 09:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latrun 220917 M52 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latrun 220917 Makmat-160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TLV Safari 170812 Rhino 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 18:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphek Yarkon park 271012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avdat 260914 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, small but large enough --Michielverbeek 06:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

File:TLV 160617 Prettimess 04.jpg

File:TLV 160617 Prettimess 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:DW Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

MB-one (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:TLV 160617 Prettimess 04.jpg

File:TLV 160617 Prettimess 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latrun 220917 Kubinka Magach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sepphoris (Tzippori) 290314 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sepphoris (Tzippori) 290314 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sepphoris (Tzippori) 290314 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Balmy Alley 170415 01.jpg

File:Balmy Alley 170415 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TBSHVT 110217 53 Battalion memorial 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition. -- Ikan Kekek 01:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gezer 261215 HaMeginim Wood 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Clarion Alley 170415 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Clarion Alley 170415 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, Missvain (talk) 18:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Clarion Alley 170415 01.jpg

File:Clarion Alley 170415 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Artwork by artist 'Ze dating to 2014 and 2015[1]. Per the copyright policy on the Clarion Mural Project website, all artworks are under federal Copyright Act copyright protection. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Missvain (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Clarion Alley 170415 03.jpg

File:Clarion Alley 170415 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 23:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Category:Aviv Kochavi visit to the United States, June 2021

היי. הקטגוריה שאני יצרתי הייתה הראשונה, והיא גם הייתה מפורטת יותר בקטלוג שלה. ברשותך אני אשחזר אותך ואעביר את הקטגוריה החדשה לתת-קטגוריה של הביקור של כוכבי באלרינגטון. Mbkv717 (talk) 11:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

כמובן, אין צורך אפילו לבקש Poliocretes (talk) 12:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Japan 310316 Genjiyama Park 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Japan 310316 Genjiyama Park 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:AMSTRDM 230217 Moco Banksy 02.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:AMSTRDM 230217 Moco Banksy 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AMSTRDM 230217 Moco Banksy 02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

--Chianti (talk) 15:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Protesting Invasion of Ukraine TLV 260222 02.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Protesting Invasion of Ukraine TLV 260222 02.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

A.Savin 13:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Museum 080621 Gal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Museum 080621 Gal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caesarea Maritima obelisk 290621 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

File:BTS Hebron Tour 280215 20.jpg

File:BTS Hebron Tour 280215 20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:35, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Demonstrating against judicial reform 250223 08.jpg

File:Demonstrating against judicial reform 250223 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Iron Swords 141023 Azrieli Bring Them Home.jpg

File:Iron Swords 141023 Azrieli Bring Them Home.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)