User talk:Neveselbert (mobile)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gordon Brown, portrait photography.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albert Reynolds, portrait photography.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enda Kenny in 2012, portrait photography.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peter Sutherland, 1985, portrait photography.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Neville-Chamberlain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Robert Knight Barney.jpg[edit]

Please explain why you have tagged File:Robert Knight Barney.jpg for deletion. I have read Commons:But it's my own work! and will e-mail permission from myself. Flibirigit (talk) 01:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Flibirigit. Sorry, but I couldn't tell whether it really was your own work given the lack of metadata. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 03:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I am unsure why there is no metadata, and have no idea how it works. I took the photo with my phone, cropped it via Paint 3D, then uploaded it. Flibirigit (talk) 04:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh OK, that's what probably removed the metadata. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
How does we resolve this concern? Is there a way to keep metadata when cropping an image? I still have the original uncropped version of Mr. Barney, and I assume the metadata would be intact. I have no idea how to find the data. I notice that this uncropped photo taken with the same phone has the metadata. Flibirigit (talk) 13:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
When you crop a photo in some image editing software, it can sometimes remove or alter the metadata. This depends on the specific software and how it handles metadata. Paint 3D may not preserve the metadata by default. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-47[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-48[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-49[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-50[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 02:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-51[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2024-02[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2024-03[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2024-04[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jacques Delors, 1993, portrait photography.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2024-05[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]