User talk:PawełMM/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

• Archive #1


watermark removed of Getty images

hello Mr. PawełMM, I am writing to ask you if you happen to be able to delete the getty images filigree in the files, I see I'm asking you because recently I uploaded some photographs and illustrations of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, from expired copyright, but I have the problem that these following files, have attached the watermark, I could ask if by chance I could overload the files without watermark ??? :) :) :)--Hopytrus12 (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=User+talk%3APawe%C5%82MM&returntoquery=action%3Dedit

I had uploaded some already watermarked files, analyzing the copyright well, the right that copyright is not compromised, but I wonder how it could be overloaded some files, ,,, could one do me this favor? :)--Hopytrus12 (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Water striders at Kaveri bank near Biligundlu JEG3699.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jegan 15:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo PawełMM,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Wiki Loves Africa

The Wiki Loves Africa 2017 photographic contest is officially closed. Thank you all for your participation !

This year, the photographic competition has resulted in an amazing 18,294 image uploads to Commons around the theme People at Work.
International winners have been announced !!! Check it out on Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2017/Winners. Congratulations to winners and all those who participated and organised events. More national winners are yet to be announced.
Please follow us on Facebook to know more and stay informed next year.

There are several fun ways you can help us to make the impact of Wiki Loves Africa stronger:

  • Add more categories to your images so that people will find them to use them in articles ... you can see how to do this here: Quick Guide to Categories on Commons
  • Improve the images description to make them easier to understand and reuse.
  • Add your image to a relevant Wikipedia article, i.e. if your image shows a tailor sewing, then add the image to an article on Sewing or Tailors - this allows readers to see different global perspectives of a universal subject. You can see how to do this here: How to insert images into Wikipedia using WikiText
  • If there is no article that reflects the subject of your images, then start an article about that subject. If you are a new editor, you can see how to do that here: Creating your first article
  • Add more images - you can add more images or media that reflect interesting and encyclopedic subjects in your immediate community.
  • Use the images produced during the contest. Here is a short link to the best ones : c:Category:Best images from Wiki Loves Africa 2017

We look forward to seeing your contributions!!

Warmest,

Anthere for the Wiki Loves Africa Team


Le concours Wiki Loves Africa 2017 est officiellement fermé. Merci d'avoir participé !
Cette année, le concours photo Wiki Loves Africa 2017 a permis l'ajout de 18,294 photos à Wikimedia Commons sur le thème Les gens au travail, une participation en très forte augmentation par rapport aux années précédentes.
Les gagnants ont été annoncés !!! Voir tous les résultats sur Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2017/Winners. Félicitations aux gagnants mais aussi à tous les participants ainsi qu'aux organisateurs d'évènements. Des gagnants nationaux doivent encore être annoncés.
Suivez nos actualités sur Facebook pour en savoir plus et être informés du prochain concours.

Le projet se veut une célébration de la diversité visuelle de l'Afrique sur Wikipédia et ses projets frères. Vous pouvez augmenter l'impact de Wiki Loves Africa des façons suivantes:

  • Fournir d'avantage de photos !
  • Ajouter des catégories à vos images afin que les utilisateurs les trouvent plus facilement. Voici comment faire: Commons:Catégories.
  • Vous pouvez également améliorer les descriptions de vos images pour faciliter leur compréhension et leur réutilisation.
  • Ajouter vos images dans un article existant sur Wikipédia.
  • S'il n'existe aucun article correspondant à ce qu'illustre votre photo, pourquoi ne pas envisager de créer un nouvel article sur Wikipedia ?
  • Vous pouvez même rejoindre un groupe d'utilisateurs locaux. Vous pouvez trouver les groupes déjà existant ici: groupes Wikimedia en Afrique
  • Utilisez les meilleures images produites pendant le concours. Voici un lien vers les meilleures : c:Category:Best images from Wiki Loves Africa 2017

Merci encore pour vos contributions.

Anthere pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa.

مسابقة التصوير الفوتوغرافي ويكي تهوى إفريقيا 2017 رسميًا مغلقة . شكرا لكم على مشاركتكم !

في هذا العام ، أسفرت مسابقة التصوير الفوتوغرافي عن تحميلات مذهلة للصور بلغ عددها 18،294 إلى كومنز حول موضوع الناس في العمل.

تم الإعلان عن الفائزين الدوليين !!! شاهد ذلك على كومنز: ويكي تهوى إفريقيا 2017 / الفائزين. تهانينا للفائزين وجميع من شاركوا في الفعاليات التي نظمت. المزيد من الفائزين الوطنيين لم يعلن بعد. يرجى متابعتنا على فيسبوك لمعرفة المزيد من االأخبار والبقاء على اطلاع للسنة المقبلة .

هناك العديد من الطرق الممتعة التي يمكنك مساعدتنا في جعل ويكي تهوى إفريقيا أقوى تأثيرا:

  • أضف المزيد من التصانيف إلى صورك حتى يعثر عليها المستخدمون لإستعمالها في المقالات... يمكنك أن ترى كيفية القيام بذلك هنا: الدليل السريع التصانيف في كومنز
  • قم بتحسين وصف الصور لتسهيل فهمها وإعادة استخدامها.
  • أضف صورتك إلى مقالة في ويكيبيديا ذات صلة، أي إذا كانت صورتك تعرض خياطة مخصصة ، أضف الصورة إلى مقالة عن الخياطة أو الخياطة - وهذا يتيح للقراء رؤية مشاهد عالمية مختلفة لموضوع عالمي. يمكنك أن ترى كيفية القيام بذلك هنا: كيفية إدراج الصور في ويكيبيديا باستخدام ويكي نص
  • إذا لم تكن هناك مقالة تعكس موضوع صورك ، فقم ببدء مقال حول هذا الموضوع. إذا كنت محررًا جديدًا ، يمكنك مشاهدة كيفية القيام بذلك هنا: إنشاء مقالتك الأولى.
  • إضافة المزيد من الصور - يمكنك إضافة المزيد من الصور أو الوسائط التي تعكس مواضيع مثيرة للاهتمام وموسوعية في مجتمعك المباشر.
  • استخدم الصور المنتجة خلال المسابقة. هنا رابط قصير لأفضلها أفضل الصور من ويكي تهوى إفريقيا

نحن شغوفون إلى رؤية مساهماتك !!

تحياتنا ،

أنتير من فريق ويكي تهوى إفريقيا

A Barnstar for Your Tireless Contributions at the Photography Lab

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Every time I look at the Photography lab I am amazed at your tireless contributions and the quality of your work. Your work is really making a difference to a lot of articles, so thank you for your hard work! Fritzmann2002 (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Electrician servicing an overhead light from a scissor jack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A perspective correction is needed: both side are leaning in. --Basotxerri 08:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support Looks good now --Daniel Case 04:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Photo workshop

This is by way of constructive criticism so don't get annoyed at my calling you out; we all do our best. I don't know what you use to cleanup images such as these which are pretty poor leaving very wobbly edges. Perhaps your software does not do paths that can give smooth but nicely curved natural looking edges. Maybe you used a clone tool to create the edges for removing the unwanted portions. Unfortunately I don't have a current photoshop, though I have it on an old laptop but that's just a pain to resurrect, for such occasional jobs I seldom do. Maybe you can create an alpha channel for the same purpose in your software. But thanks for all the work you do in the workshop. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 16:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the remarks. I corrected some of the faults. PawełMM (talk) 06:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

hello Mr. PawełMM, I am writing to you if you could kindly overload these files, without the watermark of getty images ??--95.245.76.172 19:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Done as requested. PawełMM (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thank you fully, I would then like to take care to send them also these files, which is filigreed, and just waiting to be fixed :)--87.8.55.118 09:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
The second picture was also done. PawełMM (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for its overloads, and I was wondering if you can not remove the alamy watermark in addition to gettyimages???--Глнстый Карой (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Alamy

hello Mr. PawełMM, I am writing to ask you if you will not only remove the watermarks of gettyi images, but also understand that it is a tediante job, I asked you if by chance you can also delete the watermark of alamy ???--L673A (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

ahah but look at mine is a question in general, not yet found an alamy file for now, but I ask her if she would be capable as she did with the getty images watermark :)--L673A (talk) 10:58, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Photography workshop

Hi, I see that you probably the most active user there. Could you please close the requests with {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} time to time, so that they get archived automatically? Thanks a lot for your contributions! Yann (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Official Dinner 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Official Dinner 1 (retouched).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turtlewong (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Dilma Rousseff 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Re:alamy

I send you two files of this origin, I think I can do something, how did you manage with gettyimages ???

--87.5.4.215 19:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Kremnička massacre victims 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Catrìona (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

PBA

Can you remove the watermark on these images? Please just do that. No cropping or cleaning. Upload over the existing files. Don’t create derivative files. Thank you.KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:36, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

  • File:Keelikolani with Parker and Cummins, photograph by Menzies Dickson, PBA Galleries.jpg
  • File:Kalakaua, photograph by Menzies Dickson, PBA Galleries.jpg
  • File:Leleiohoku, photograph by Menzies Dickson, PBA Galleries.jpg
  • File:Liliuokalani, photograph by Menzies Dickson, PBA Galleries.jpg
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kkz kizlyarka big.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kkz kizlyarka big.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 22:27, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Gettyimages

hi Mr. PawełMM, I am writing to ask you if you could kindly find the time, to overload these last files with the watermark of gety images, are not many, could kindly overload them by removing the watermark of gettyimages ?, if you find the time to make me this small favor? :) see the following files, only those that were uploaded on October 9th.


those all have the damn watermark --87.14.89.83 12:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@87.14.89.83 and Ginwe: Done as requested.

PawełMM (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

thank you very much, so out of curiosity, do you have any special program to be able to eliminate the watermark? :)--Ginwe (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
hi, sorry if I'm bothering you, I would like to ask you if you could finish me the last watermark images of getty images, which are 4 rows of 9th October, and 1 file of 10th October.--Ginwe (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thanks for the answer, I did not want to bother you too much from the wonderful job you had done, thank you very much :)--Ginwe (talk) 17:49, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Australian Film Commission logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 21:36, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mario Segale in 1952 (01).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mario Segale in 1952 (01).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 — billinghurst sDrewth 12:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Todaiji model pagoda (retouched).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Marie-Olympe-de-Gouges.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sammyday (talk) 08:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Derivative works

Hi, your reupload of File:Secesní budova MUD zdroj MUD.jpg was reverted. If you create some derivative works, upload them under new names. Avoid overwriting images with new uploads, except for minor uncontroversial improvements. Thank you. --ŠJů (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Likouala-aux-Herbes.png

Wow, how did you do that... Regards Peter in s (talk) 08:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Freddy Mercury Statue Montreux (retouched).jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Freddy Mercury Statue Montreux (retouched).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 00:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Re:

hi dear PawełMM, I write to you that I uploaded some portraits of PD-100 with the gettymages watermark, could you overload them without? thank you ,

(I also point you 'user L673A who uploaded some completely flammable files, could you throw an eye? --Ginwe (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

I noticed, and for this I thank you for your personal initiatives thank you very much :) --Ginwe (talk) 20:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Stan Lee (2018) b-w.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: see copyvio on source file > [Clear Copyvio. Image by JON KOPALOFF/FILMMAGIC see here and here
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Migebert (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JacquesNannan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JacquesNannan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Kaipo and Aimoku.jpg

Can you crop, flatten, straighten and fix this image? Please upload over original. Don't create a derivative file. Thanks. KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:SFGoncharenko.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SFGoncharenko.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Albert Pierrepoint.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SchroCat (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

New Version

hi Mr. PawełMM, I am writing to ask you if you could kindly carry out overloading on current files of gradifa and very bad size, with files that I would show you to be overloaded to new version.on the left, I inserted files that should be overloaded, and on the right I took you links that files that could be the current version.


current version New Version

--87.14.89.224 18:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Reply

@87.14.89.224: Done as requested except #1. PawełMM (talk) 13:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

thanks for your time, appropsed I'll add you this file too to be overloaded by this portrait--87.14.89.224 16:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Zlot Zimowy Wikimedian, Kalisz, 25-27 stycznia 2019 PM 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tar Lócesilion (queta) 20:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your tireless efforts to create new rebus for a total stranger over Internet

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Thank you, PawelMM-san for editing the images spot-on for new rebuses. Thank you very muchMiss Puzzle (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Plan Warszawy 1914-1918.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

mritz (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Po próbie. Filharmonia Narodowa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 13:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in Wiki Loves Love 2019

Wiki Loves Love 2019 has ended and team Wiki Loves Love sends you greetings and appreciation for joining us in spreading love around the globe and documents how love is expressed in different cultures. We hope to see you again in 2020. Till then stay tuned to know the results of WLL19 that will be out in this April. Please make sure that your email is enabled so we can communicate with you if you are one of our prize winners.(learn more how to do)

Best regards.

Wiki Loves Love International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Oops

Thank you for removing the main watermark in File:The Road to Dividends (Dorgan).jpg, but Getty includes two: the big one, and a small one in the lower left corner. If you could get that one also? Thanks in advance. DS (talk) 18:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Kotlasskiy kraevedcheskiy musey (093).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Strong and Stable sign in Shoreditch, London (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Philafrenzy (talk) 10:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rice bran oil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

File:10 złotych 1970 Byliśmy-Jesteśmy-Będziemy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gonzuchna (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Hallo PawełMM,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Diocletian Roman coin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Re:

hi dear PawełMM, I am writing to ask you for help regarding two sorcerings, which I just can't do:

1)(https://media.mutualart.com/Images//2018_11/28/10/102409001/a74b7517-f68d-4a29-89aa-e8fc96212f2e.Jpeg) for this (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clemente_XIV_a_cavallo_di_fronte_a_Castelgandolfo.jpg)

2) (https://www.rte.ie/centuryireland//images/uploads/article-images/Ed143-WilsonVictorEmmanuel1-LoC.jpg) for this (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wilson_and_Joffre.gif)--87.8.55.130 19:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Тетяна Яблонська. Автопортрет в українському костюмі (1946).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Autor Tetiana Yablonska (dead 2015), created 1946. No Permission.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Микола Василечко (talk) 10:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Oops

Thank you for the deshutterstocking of that image, but you missed a bit - just to the right of the word "contentment". Could you fix that? Thanks in advance. DS (talk) 03:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Similarly, when you degettified File:The Answer (Syms).jpg, you missed a square of getty decoloration on the right margin, about a third of the way from the bottom. Again - if you could fix that, it would be very convenient. Thank you. DS (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Hallo PavelMM, danke für das bearbeiten des Stuckrelief-Bildes, kannst du bei dem oben angegebenen Bild versuchen den Kapellenraum hinter dem Holzgitter aufzuhellen, ich wäre dir äußerst dankbar, Gruß Ricarda --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Hallo PawelMM, ich habe noch ein weiteres Bearbeitungs-Anliegen an dich. Könntest du das Bild bitte entspiegeln, denn auf der Vitrinen-Verglasung zeichnen sich deutlich meine Umrisse ab. Vielen Dank schon im Voraus, Lg Ricarda --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 16:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks so much for taking my requests. I hope you have a great day! Neveselbert (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019


Hallo PawełMM,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Tuchola 1919 russian pow go.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Jagjivan Ram.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jagjivan Ram.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

sourced to image since deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Watermark

Can you please remove the watermark on File:Grace Kamaikui Kahoalii, Lucy Peabody and Lizzie Kia Nahaolelua (full).jpg? KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Can you remove the watermarks from these images? KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


Can you please remove the watermark? Please upload over the original.

KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Also this.

KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Can you remove the watermark from this image: https://c8.alamy.com/comp/RTTN9K/portrait-of-princess-victoria-kaiulani-hawaii-1898-RTTN9K.jpg ; version of this File:Kaiulani in profile, wearing pearl necklace, posting for a camera with back turned, photograph by J. J. Wiilams.jpg? KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC) @KAVEBEAR: ✓[OK]

Can you remove the water from this image: File:Kaiulani in profile, wearing pearl necklace, facing left, photograph by J. J. Wiilams.jpg? KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC) @KAVEBEAR: ✓[OK]

Can you remove the watermark from these images: File:Liliuokalani riding in an automobile, c. 1915.jpg and File:Kalakaua at the White House (Bishop Museum SCP 117533).jpg. KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC) ✓[OK]

Can you remove the watermark from this image:File:Queen Emma of Hawaii, photograph by Sutterley Brothers.jpg? KAVEBEAR (talk) 10:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC) ✓[OK]

Dear PawełMM,

Please do not photoshop original images indiscriminately. I just reverted your image processed version which caused unnatural colours and turned the black heads of the Africans in a black swamp. The "enhanced contrast" (?) was not worth the while, on the contrary. Enjoy the light, Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 12:00, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

PS We shouldn't add false colours to images of historical events etc., we are NOT the NASA! Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 12:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 12:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi. In case you're wondering how I cropped that, I thought I'd share. It might save you some effort. Because the shape is not a "proper" oval, I did it like this:

  • Draw a default oval in a new layer with the shape tool, which fits at the centres of top, bottom, left and right.
  • Because the desired area isn't a "proper" oval, this shape will leave the "corner areas" uncovered.
  • So, with the "warp" tool - "pull out" the 4 corners of the shape until they align.
  • ^^This is a bit "fiddly" so you might need to do it in a couple of stages/resizes to line up properly all round.
  • Now you have the correct "stretched oval" use it as a mask, or with the wand etc. to create a crop selection.

Because it starts with a nice, smooth oval which you only distort, this way avoids trying to draw the curves "by hand" which is very difficult to get exactly right. Also, when creating the initial oval I always start with an oval at least 1.5 times as big as needed, and scale/resize adjust downwards to fit, because scaling up can create horrid, jagged edges, and finally I add a couple of pixels blank border to the cropped image so that Mediawiki, when thumbnailing, doesn't create those horrible artefacts it often does where the curves "touch" the edges. There are probably even better ways to do it all than that, but that's what "works" for me - I hope some of it might help you sometime. Cheers. -- Begoon 07:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

File:King George VI LOC matpc.14736 (cleaned).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Celia Homeford (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Re:

hi PawełMM ,, I am writing to tell you that the files you kindly fetched me have been deleted .. I really feel furious, not because they have deleted them, but they have had little regard for you too. please, could you request immediate restoration to commons undeletion request ???--188.216.112.121 23:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Replay: What picture do you mean? I don't know where to protest. PawełMM (talk) 07:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


here it is, these are all files watermarked by gettyimages.in, and the only way to be able to ask for their immediate restoration is COM:UNDEL — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.216.112.121 (talk) 10:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 18:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Santuario de la Ntra. Sra. de Guadalupe Churintzio, Michoacán,.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--00:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Anna Comnena profilsayfasi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DeCausa (talk) 14:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Saul Salcedo Sanchez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Anne-Vere-Chamberlain-ne-Cole.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Photo of obelisk ruins

@PawełMM: Hello there, sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if you could perhaps help me with a certain photo, namely the one above depicting the ruins of the Boyne Obelisk from 1923 (similar to the photo you improved earlier today in the Graphics Lab, only this one shows the Obelisk ruins from a different angle). Is there anything that can be done to improve the quality of the above picture in any way at all? Or is it unchangeable? Again, sorry for the hassle, I just felt I had to ask. Thanks. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Border cropping

Hi Paweł. Can you please overwrite by cropping to remove the white border for each of these files:

Given the file-size, my internet connection is playing up, so I'm not able to do this by myself. AlbanGeller (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

 Thank you. AlbanGeller (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Lenin10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


File renaming

Hello, PawełMM. You have new messages at 4nn1l2's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Hi Paweł! Can you please consent re moving James Callaghan (1975) (cropped).jpg to James Callaghan (1975).jpg? Thanks! AlbanGeller (talk) 14:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

@AlbanGeller: I have requested a change of name. PawełMM (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Paweł. Can you also please request a change at Max van der Stoel (1975) (cropped).jpg (to Max van der Stoel (1975).jpg)? All the best, AlbanGeller (talk) 16:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Vellere lucie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:20, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

overloading

hi PawełMM I am writing to you because there would be some files to be overloaded concerning the watermark:

--37.182.21.58 20:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

@37.182.21.58: I'm sorry, but I won't do it. The necessary workload significantly exceeds the expected effect. PawełMM (talk) 10:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Li Xian Chinese Actor.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Jovenel Moise 2015 cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

File:J-m-dent-and-sons atlas-of-ancient-and-classical-geography 1912 syria-mesopotamia-assyria-etc-northern-middle-east 3296 2114 600.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  03:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Was able to source a bigger version. Ugh, I really hate working with things with that much watermarking, though. It's the kind of thing where everything's temporary until qan unwatermarked version comes out.. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Herb redemptorystów.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Herb redemptorystów.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 03:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Aditya (talk) 15:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Place a template on retouched images file pages

Hi, PawełMM. I want to ask you to always add a retouched picture template to the file pages of files that you have uploaded or on which you have overwritten the original. I am not a fan of retouching pictures, and I really don't think there's an improvement from f.i. this to this or this to this – to just pick two examples – and frankly it's my opinion a lot of your work is making images worse (blurring backgrounds like this I find really terrible), but at least add a retouched template. And don't place it far down beneath the license info, but add it before the file description, because your interference is huge. Thanks, Eissink (talk) 21:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC).

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Pawe%C5%82MM,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Paweł. Can you please look at taking this request? (Blue Sonic has done a good job, but I'd prefer it if you could blur the original image in the same way as you did for Patrick Hillery.jpg.) Thanks! ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

File:2 Mariengroschen 1708 Georg Ludwig-04452 (Vs).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HReuter (talk) 09:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

File:2 Mariengroschen 1708 Georg Ludwig-04452 (Rs).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HReuter (talk) 09:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2 Anna 037.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2 Anna 037.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 17:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Todor Zhivkov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

You cut a small part of the upmost seal. Sorry for being such a picky :) --Flaspec (talk) 19:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Didier Raoult.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Olivier LPB (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Bolívar fuerte notes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BigrTex (talk) 02:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

File:David Bowie's Blackstar musicians.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   21:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you so much for retouching that picture for me! I was wondering how exactly you removed the watermark so that perhaps, if you used GIMP to do it, I could copy your method.

And the fact that you were able to remove the bar code is unbelievably impressive. How on earth did you manage to do the impossible, especially so quickly?! I was convinced that the bar code tag was on the book while it was scanned, so again, how? There must be something I'm missing here. PseudoSkull (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@PseudoSkull: I use GIMP. For many years I have been playing with such small corrections of graphics and photographs. This allowed me to learn many possibilities of this program.
And how I did what you asked for. I removed the watermark using cloning and copying. It is very simple, but it requires attention and it is good to do it in an enlarged image scale.
When it comes to removing bar code, this is a trick. As you can see the pattern at the bottom of the page is symmetrical. I decided that the top one is probably the same. So I marked and copied the relevant fragment at the top of the page, flipped it and pasted it in place of the bar code. PawełMM (talk) 07:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Merry Christmas, Paweł! ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 23:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Paweł, would it be alright if I set up automated archiving of your talkpage? It's getting rather long and difficult to navigate. Happy holidays, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 22:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)